Classics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Classical literature)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Homer, the legendary author of the Iliad and the Odyssey
Cicero, the statesman and comrade of Julius Caesar known as the master of Latin prose

Classics or classical studies is the study of classical antiquity, and in Western culture traditionally refers to the study of Classical Greek and Roman literature in their original languages of Ancient Greek and Latin, respectively. It may also include Greco-Roman philosophy, history, and archaeology as secondary subjects. Traditionally in the West, the study of the Greek and Roman classics was considered one of the cornerstones of the humanities and a fundamental element of a rounded education. The study of classics has therefore traditionally been a cornerstone of a typical elite European education.

Etymology[edit]

The word classics is derived from the Latin adjective classicus, meaning "belonging to the highest class of citizens". The word was originally used to describe the members of the highest class in ancient Rome. By the 2nd century AD the word was used in literary criticism to describe writers of the highest quality.[1] For example, Aulus Gellius, in his Attic Nights, contrasts "classicus" and "proletarius" writers.[2] By the 6th century AD, the word had acquired a second meaning, referring to pupils at a school.[1] Thus the two modern meanings of the word, referring both to literature considered to be of the highest quality, and to the standard texts used as part of a curriculum, both derive from Roman use.[1]

History[edit]

Middle Ages[edit]

Photograph of a bronze bust of a man. It rests on a stone plinth, on which the words "Gaius Valerius Catullus 87 AC–54 AC" are written.
The Roman poet Catullus was virtually unknown during the medieval period, in contrast to his modern popularity.

In the Middle Ages, classics and education were tightly intertwined; according to Jan Ziolkowski, there is no era in history in which the link was tighter.[3] Medieval education taught students to imitate earlier classical models,[4] and Latin continued to be the language of scholarship and culture, despite the increasing difference between literary Latin and the vernacular languages of Europe during the period.[4]

While Latin was hugely influential, however, Greek was barely studied, and Greek literature survived almost solely in Latin translation.[5] The works of even major Greek authors such as Hesiod, whose names continued to be known by educated Europeans, were unavailable in the Middle Ages.[5] In the thirteenth century, the English philosopher Roger Bacon wrote that "there are not four men in Latin Christendom who are acquainted with the Greek, Hebrew, and Arabic grammars."[6]

Along with the unavailability of Greek authors, there were other differences between the classical canon known today and the works valued in the Middle Ages. Catullus, for instance, was almost entirely unknown in the medieval period.[5] The popularity of different authors also waxed and waned throughout the period: Lucretius, popular during the Carolingian period, was barely read in the twelfth century, while for Quintilian the reverse is true.[5]

Renaissance[edit]

The Renaissance led to the increasing study of both ancient literature and ancient history,[7] as well as a revival of classical styles of Latin.[8] From the 14th century, first in Italy and then increasingly across Europe, Renaissance Humanism, an intellectual movement that "advocated the study and imitation of classical antiquity",[7] developed. Humanism saw a reform in education in Europe, introducing a wider range of Latin authors as well as bringing back the study of Greek language and literature to Western Europe.[8] This reintroduction was initiated by Petrarch (1304–1374) and Boccaccio (1313–1375) who commissioned a Calabrian scholar to translate the Homeric poems.[9] This humanist educational reform spread from Italy, in Catholic countries as it was adopted by the Jesuits, and in countries that became Protestant such as England, Germany, and the Low Countries, in order to ensure that future clerics were able to study the New Testament in the original language.[10]

Neoclassicism[edit]

The late 17th and 18th centuries are the period in Western European literary history which is most associated with the classical tradition, as writers consciously adapted classical models.[11] Classical models were so highly prized that the plays of William Shakespeare were rewritten along neoclassical lines, and these "improved" versions were performed throughout the 18th century.[12]

From the beginning of the 18th century, the study of Greek became increasingly important relative to that of Latin.[13] In this period Johann Winckelmann's claims for the superiority of the Greek visual arts influenced a shift in aesthetic judgements, while in the literary sphere, G.E. Lessing "returned Homer to the centre of artistic achievement".[14] In the United Kingdom, the study of Greek in schools began in the late 18th century. The poet Walter Savage Landor claimed to have been one of the first English schoolboys to write in Greek during his time at Rugby School.[15]

19th century[edit]

The 19th century saw the influence of the classical world, and the value of a classical education, decline,[16] especially in the US, where the subject was often criticised for its elitism.[17] By the 19th century, little new literature was still being written in Latin – a practice which had continued as late as the 18th century – and a command of Latin declined in importance.[10] Correspondingly, classical education from the 19th century onwards began to increasingly de-emphasise the importance of the ability to write and speak Latin.[13] In the United Kingdom this process took longer than elsewhere. Composition continued to be the dominant classical skill in England until the 1870s, when new areas within the discipline began to increase in popularity.[18] In the same decade came the first challenges to the requirement of Greek at the universities of Oxford and Cambridge, though it would not be finally abolished for another 50 years.[19]

Though the influence of classics as the dominant mode of education in Europe and North America was in decline in the 19th century, the discipline was rapidly evolving in the same period. Classical scholarship was becoming more systematic and scientific, especially with the "new philology" created at the end of the 18th and beginning of the 19th century.[20] Its scope was also broadening: it was during the 19th century that ancient history and classical archaeology began to be seen as part of classics rather than separate disciplines.[18]

20th century to present[edit]

During the 20th century, the study of classics became less common. In England, for instance, Oxford and Cambridge universities stopped requiring students to have qualifications in Greek in 1920,[19] and in Latin at the end of the 1950s.[21] When the National Curriculum was introduced in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland in 1988, it did not mention the classics.[21] By 2003, only about 10% of state schools in Britain offered any classical subjects to their students at all.[22] In 2016, AQA, the largest exam board for A-Levels and GCSE's in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, announced that it would be scrapping A-Level subjects in Classical Civilization, Archaeology, and Art History.[23] This left just one out of five exam boards in England which still offered Classical Civilization as a subject. The decision was immediately denounced by archaeologists and historians, with Natalie Haynes of the Guardian stating that the loss of the A-Level would deprive state school students, 93% of all students, the opportunity to study classics while making it once again the exclusive purview of wealthy private-school students.[24]

However, the study of classics has not declined as fast elsewhere in Europe. In 2009, a review of Meeting the Challenge, a collection of conference papers about the teaching of Latin in Europe, noted that though there is opposition to the teaching of Latin in Italy, it is nonetheless still compulsory in most secondary schools.[25] The same can be said in the case of France or Greece, too. Indeed, Ancient Greek is one of the compulsory subjects in Greek secondary education, whereas in France, Latin is one of the optional subjects that can be chosen in a majority of middle schools and high schools. Ancient Greek is also still being taught, but not as much as Latin.

Sub-disciplines[edit]

One of the most notable characteristics of the modern study of classics is the diversity of the field. Although traditionally focused on ancient Greece and Rome, the study now encompasses the entire ancient Mediterranean world, thus expanding the studies to Northern Africa as well as parts of the Middle East.[citation needed]

Philology[edit]

Black-and-white image of Friedrich August Wolf in profile
The eighteenth-century classicist Friedrich August Wolf was the author of Prolegomena to Homer, one of the first great works of classical philology.

Philology is the study of language preserved in written sources; classical philology is thus concerned with understanding any texts from the classical period written in the classical languages of Latin and Greek.[26] The roots of classical philology lie in the Renaissance, as humanist intellectuals attempted to return to the Latin of the classical period, especially of Cicero,[27] and as scholars attempted to produce more accurate editions of ancient texts.[28] Some of the principles of philology still used today were developed during this period, for instance, the observation that if a manuscript could be shown to be a copy of an earlier extant manuscript, then it provides no further evidence of the original text, was made as early as 1489 by Angelo Poliziano.[29] Other philological tools took longer to be developed: the first statement, for instance, of the principle that a more difficult reading should be preferred over a simpler one, was in 1697 by Jean Le Clerc.[30]

The modern discipline of classical philology began in Germany at the turn of the nineteenth century.[20] It was during this period that scientific principles of philology began to be put together into a coherent whole,[31] in order to provide a set of rules by which scholars could determine which manuscripts were most accurate.[32] This "new philology", as it was known, centred around the construction of a genealogy of manuscripts, with which a hypothetical common ancestor, closer to the original text than any existing manuscript, could be reconstructed.[33]

Archaeology[edit]

Black and white photograph of the Lion Gate at Mycenae.
Schliemann and Dörpfeld's excavation at Mycenae was one of the earliest excavations in the field of classical archaeology.

Classical archaeology is the oldest branch of archaeology,[34] with its roots going back to J.J. Winckelmann's work on Herculaneum in the 1760s.[35] It was not until the last decades of the 19th century, however, that classical archaeology became part of the tradition of Western classical scholarship.[35] It was included as part of Cambridge University's Classical Tripos for the first time after the reforms of the 1880s, though it did not become part of Oxford's Greats until much later.[19]

The second half of the 19th century saw Schliemann's excavations of Troy and Mycenae; the first excavations at Olympia and Delos; and Arthur Evans' work in Crete, particularly on Knossos.[36] This period also saw the foundation of important archaeological associations (e.g. the Archaeological Institute of America in 1879),[37] including many foreign archaeological institutes in Athens and Rome (the American School of Classical Studies at Athens in 1881, British School at Athens in 1886, American Academy in Rome in 1895, and British School at Rome in 1900).[38]

More recently, classical archaeology has taken little part in the theoretical changes in the rest of the discipline,[39] largely ignoring the popularity of "New Archaeology", which emphasised the development of general laws derived from studying material culture, in the 1960s.[40] New Archaeology is still criticized by traditional minded scholars of classical archaeology despite a wide acceptance of its basic techniques.[41]

Art history[edit]

Some art historians focus their study on the development of art in the classical world. Indeed, the art and architecture of Ancient Rome and Greece is very well regarded and remains at the heart of much of our art today. For example, Ancient Greek architecture gave us the Classical Orders: Doric, Ionic, and Corinthian. The Parthenon is still the architectural symbol of the classical world.

Greek sculpture is well known and we know the names of several Ancient Greek artists: for example, Phidias.

Ancient history[edit]

With philology, archaeology, and art history, scholars seek understanding of the history and culture of a civilisation, through critical study of the extant literary and physical artefacts, in order to compose and establish a continual historic narrative of the Ancient World and its peoples. The task is difficult due to a dearth of physical evidence: for example, Sparta was a leading Greek city-state, yet little evidence of it survives to study, and what is available comes from Athens, Sparta's principal rival; likewise, the Roman Empire destroyed most evidence (cultural artefacts) of earlier, conquered civilizations, such as that of the Etruscans.

Philosophy[edit]

The English word "philosophy" comes from the Greek word φιλοσοφία, meaning "love of wisdom", probably coined by Pythagoras. Along with the word itself, the discipline of philosophy as we know it today has its roots in ancient Greek thought, and according to Martin West "philosophy as we understand it is a Greek creation".[42] Ancient philosophy was traditionally divided into three branches: logic, physics, and ethics.[43] However, not all of the works of ancient philosophers fit neatly into one of these three branches. For instance, Aristotle's Rhetoric and Poetics have been traditionally classified in the West as "ethics", but in the Arabic world were grouped with logic; in reality, they do not fit neatly into either category.[43]

From the last decade of the eighteenth century, scholars of ancient philosophy began to study the discipline historically.[44] Previously, works on ancient philosophy had been unconcerned with chronological sequence and with reconstructing the reasoning of ancient thinkers; with what Wolfgang-Ranier Mann calls "New Philosophy", this changed.[45]

Reception studies[edit]

A relatively recent new discipline within the classics is "reception studies",[46] which developed in the 1960s at the University of Konstanz.[47] Reception studies is concerned with how students of classical texts have understood and interpreted them.[47] As such, reception studies is interested in a two-way interaction between reader and text,[48] taking place within a historical context.[49]

Though the idea of an "aesthetics of reception" was first put forward by Hans Robert Jauss in 1967, the principles of reception theory go back much earlier than this.[48] As early as 1920, T. S. Eliot wrote that "the past [is] altered by the present as much as the present is directed by the past";[50] Charles Martindale describes this as a "cardinal principle" for many versions of modern reception theory.[48]

Classical Greece[edit]

Ancient Greece was the civilization belonging to the period of Greek history lasting from the Archaic period, beginning in the eighth century BC, to the Roman conquest of Greece after the Battle of Corinth in 146 BC. The Classical period, during the fifth and fourth centuries BC, has traditionally been considered the height of Greek civilisation.[51] The Classical period of Greek history is generally considered to have begun with the first and second Persian invasions of Greece at the start of the Greco-Persian wars,[52] and to have ended with the death of Alexander the Great.

Classical Greek culture had a powerful influence on the Roman Empire, which carried a version of it to many parts of the Mediterranean region and Europe; thus Classical Greece is generally considered to be the seminal culture which provided the foundation of Western civilization.

Language[edit]

Map showing the regional dialects of Greek during the Classical period

Ancient Greek is the historical stage in the development of the Greek language spanning the Archaic (c. 8th to 6th centuries BC), Classical (c. 5th to 4th centuries BC), and Hellenistic (c. 3rd century BC to 6th century AD) periods of ancient Greece and the ancient world. It is predated in the 2nd millennium BC by Mycenaean Greek. Its Hellenistic phase is known as Koine ("common") or Biblical Greek, and its late period mutates imperceptibly into Medieval Greek. Koine is regarded as a separate historical stage of its own, although in its earlier form it closely resembles Classical Greek. Prior to the Koine period, Greek of the classical and earlier periods included several regional dialects.

Ancient Greek was the language of Homer and of classical Athenian historians, playwrights, and philosophers. It has contributed many words to the vocabulary of English and many other European languages, and has been a standard subject of study in Western educational institutions since the Renaissance. Latinized forms of Ancient Greek roots are used in many of the scientific names of species and in other scientific terminology.

Literature[edit]

The earliest surviving works of Greek literature are epic poetry. Homer's Iliad and Odyssey are the earliest to survive to us today, probably composed in the eighth century BC.[53] These early epics were oral compositions, created without the use of writing.[54] Around the same time that the Homeric epics were composed, the Greek alphabet was introduced; the earliest surviving inscriptions date from around 750 BC.[55]

European drama was invented in ancient Greece. Traditionally this was attributed to Thespis, around the middle of the sixth century BC,[56] though the earliest surviving work of Greek drama is Aeschylus' tragedy The Persians, which dates to 472 BC.[57] Early Greek tragedy was performed by a chorus and two actors, but by the end of Aeschylus' life, a third actor had been introduced, either by him or by Sophocles.[57] The last surviving Greek tragedies are the Bacchae of Euripides and Sophocles' Oedipus at Colonus, both from the end of the fifth century BC.[58]

Surviving Greek comedy begins later than tragedy; the earliest surviving work, Aristophanes' Acharnians, comes from 425 BC.[59] However, comedy dates back as early as 486 BC, when the Dionysia added a competition for comedy to the much earlier competition for tragedy.[59] The comedy of the fifth century is known as Old Comedy, and it comes down to us solely in the eleven surviving plays of Aristophanes, along with a few fragments.[59] Sixty years after the end of Aristophanes' career, the next author of comedies to have any substantial body of work survive is Menander, whose style is known as New Comedy.[60]

Two historians flourished during Greece's classical age: Herodotus and Thucydides. Herodotus is commonly called the father of history, and his "History" contains the first truly literary use of prose in Western literature. Of the two, Thucydides was the more careful historian. His critical use of sources, inclusion of documents, and laborious research made his History of the Peloponnesian War a significant influence on later generations of historians. The greatest achievement of the 4th century was in philosophy. There were many Greek philosophers, but three names tower above the rest: Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle. These have had a profound influence on Western society.

Mythology and religion[edit]

Greek mythology is the body of myths and legends belonging to the ancient Greeks concerning their gods and heroes, the nature of the world, and the origins and significance of their own cult and ritual practices. They were a part of religion in ancient Greece. Modern scholars refer to the myths and study them in an attempt to throw light on the religious and political institutions of Ancient Greece and its civilization, and to gain understanding of the nature of myth-making itself.

Greek religion encompassed the collection of beliefs and rituals practiced in ancient Greece in the form of both popular public religion and cult practices. These different groups varied enough for it to be possible to speak of Greek religions or "cults" in the plural, though most of them shared similarities. Also, the Greek religion extended out of Greece and out to neighbouring islands.

Many Greek people recognized the major gods and goddesses: Zeus, Poseidon, Hades, Apollo, Artemis, Aphrodite, Ares, Dionysus, Hephaestus, Athena, Hermes, Demeter, Hestia and Hera; though philosophies such as Stoicism and some forms of Platonism used language that seems to posit a transcendent single deity. Different cities often worshipped the same deities, sometimes with epithets that distinguished them and specified their local nature.

Philosophy[edit]

A bust of Socrates
So influential was Socrates to classical philosophy that earlier philosophers are today known as pre-Socratics.

The earliest surviving philosophy from ancient Greece dates back to the 6th century BC, when according to Aristotle Thales of Miletus was considered to have been the first Greek philosopher.[61] Other influential pre-Socratic philosophers include Pythagoras and Heraclitus. The most famous and significant figures in classical Athenian philosophy, from the 5th to the 3rd centuries BC, are Socrates, his student Plato, and Aristotle, who studied at Plato's Academy before founding his own school, known as the Lyceum. Later Greek schools of philosophy, including the Cynics, Stoics, and Epicureans, continued to be influential after the Roman annexation of Greece, and into the post-Classical world.

Greek philosophy dealt with a wide variety of subjects, including political philosophy, ethics, metaphysics, ontology, and logic, as well as disciplines which are not today thought of as part of philosophy, such as biology and rhetoric.

Classical Rome[edit]

Language[edit]

Photograph of a gold brooch
The Praeneste fibula is believed to bear the oldest known Latin inscription. The inscription means "Manius made me for Numerius".

The language of ancient Rome was Latin, a member of the Italic family of languages. The earliest surviving inscription in Latin comes from the 7th century BC, on a brooch from Palestrina. Latin from between this point and the early 1st century BC is known as Old Latin. Most surviving Latin literature is Classical Latin, from the 1st century BC to the 2nd century AD. Latin then evolved into Late Latin, in use during the late antique period. Late Latin survived long after the end of classical antiquity, and was finally replaced by written Romance languages around the 9th century AD. Along with literary forms of Latin, there existed various vernacular dialects, generally known as Vulgar Latin, in use throughout antiquity. These are mainly preserved in sources such as graffiti and the Vindolanda tablets.

Literature[edit]

The earliest surviving Latin authors, writing in Old Latin, include the playwrights Plautus and Terence. Much of the best known and most highly thought of Latin literature comes from the classical period, with poets such as Virgil, Horace, and Ovid; historians such as Julius Caesar and Tacitus; orators such as Cicero; and philosophers such as Seneca the Younger and Lucretius. Late Latin authors include many Christian writers such as Lactantius, Tertullian and Ambrose; non-Christian authors, such as the historian Ammianus Marcellinus, are also preserved.

History[edit]

According to legend, the city of Rome was founded in 753 BC;[62] in reality, there had been a settlement on the site since around 1000 BC, when the Palatine Hill was settled.[63] The city was originally ruled by kings, first Roman, and then Etruscan – according to Roman tradition, the first Etruscan king of Rome, Tarquinius Priscus, ruled from 616 BC.[64] Over the course of the 6th century BC, the city expanded its influence over the entirety of Latium.[65] Around the end of the 6th century – traditionally in 510 BC – the kings of Rome were driven out, and the city became a republic.[66]

Around 387 BC, Rome was sacked by the Gauls following the Battle of the Allia.[67] It soon recovered from this humiliating defeat, however, and in 381 the inhabitants of Tusculum in Latium were made Roman citizens. This was the first time Roman citizenship was extended in this way.[68] Rome went on to expand its area of influence, until by 269 the entirety of the Italian peninsula was under Roman rule.[69] Soon afterwards, in 264, the First Punic War began; it lasted until 241.[70] The Second Punic War began in 218, and by the end of that year, the Carthaginian general Hannibal had invaded Italy.[71] The war saw Rome's worst defeat to that point at Cannae; the largest army Rome had yet put into the field was wiped out, and one of the two consuls leading it was killed.[72] However, Rome continued to fight, annexing much of Spain[73] and eventually defeating Carthage, ending her position as a major power and securing Roman preeminence in the Western Mediterranean.[74]

Legacy of the classical world[edit]

The classical languages of the Ancient Mediterranean world influenced every European language, imparting to each a learned vocabulary of international application. Thus, Latin grew from a highly developed cultural product of the Golden and Silver eras of Latin literature to become the international lingua franca in matters diplomatic, scientific, philosophic and religious, until the 17th century. Long before this, Latin had evolved into the Romance languages and Ancient Greek into Modern Greek and its dialects. In the specialised science and technology vocabularies, the influence of Latin and Greek is notable. Ecclesiastical Latin, the Roman Catholic Church's official language, remains a living legacy of the classical world in the contemporary world.

Latin had an impact far beyond the classical world. It continued to be the pre-eminent language for serious writings in Europe long after the fall of the Roman empire.[75] The modern Romance languages – such as French, Spanish, and Italian – all derive from Latin.[76] Latin is still seen as a foundational aspect of European culture.[77]

The legacy of the classical world is not confined to the influence of classical languages. The Roman empire was taken as a model by later European empires, such as the Spanish and British empires.[78] Classical art has been taken as a model in later periods – medieval Romanesque architecture[79] and Enlightenment-era neoclassical literature[11] were both influenced by classical models, to take but two examples, while Joyce's Ulysses is one of the most influential works of twentieth century literature.[80]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

Citations[edit]

  1. ^ a b c Ziolkowski 2007, p. 17
  2. ^ Aulus Gellius, Noctes Atticae, 19.8.15.
  3. ^ Ziolkowski 2007, p. 19
  4. ^ a b Ziolkowski 2007, p. 21
  5. ^ a b c d Ziolkowski 2007, p. 22
  6. ^ Sandys 1921, p. 591
  7. ^ a b Kristeller 1978, p. 586
  8. ^ a b Kristeller 1978, p. 587
  9. ^ Pade, M. (2007). The Reception of Plutarch's Lives in Fifteenth-Century Italy. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum
  10. ^ a b Kristeller 1978, p. 590
  11. ^ a b Kaminski 2007, p. 57
  12. ^ Kaminski 2007, p. 65
  13. ^ a b Kristeller 1978, p. 591
  14. ^ Kaminski 2007, p. 69
  15. ^ Stray 1996, p. 79
  16. ^ Becker 2001, p. 309
  17. ^ Becker 2001, p. 313
  18. ^ a b Stray 1996, p. 81
  19. ^ a b c Stray 1996, p. 83
  20. ^ a b Rommel 2001, p. 169
  21. ^ a b Stray 1996, p. 85
  22. ^ Cook 2003
  23. ^ Sally Weale (2016-10-17). "Scrapping of archaeology and classics A-levels criticized as 'barbaric act'". The Guardian. Retrieved 2018-08-02.
  24. ^ Natalie Haynes (2016-10-19). "Ditching classics at A-level is little short of a tragedy". The Guardian. Retrieved 2018-08-02.
  25. ^ Balbo 2009
  26. ^ Mackay 1997
  27. ^ Shorey 1906, p. 179
  28. ^ Mann 1996, p. 172
  29. ^ Mann 1996, pp. 173–74
  30. ^ Mann 1996, p. 174
  31. ^ Mann 1996, pp. 174–75
  32. ^ Mann 1996, p. 173
  33. ^ Mann 1996, p. 175
  34. ^ Dyson 1993, p. 205
  35. ^ a b Renfrew 1980, p. 288
  36. ^ Renfrew 1980, p. 287
  37. ^ Stray 2010, p. 5
  38. ^ Stray 2010, pp. 4–5
  39. ^ Dyson 1993, p. 204
  40. ^ Dyson 1993, p. 196
  41. ^ Darvil, Timothy (January 2009). "New Archaeology". The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Archaeology (2 ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199534043. Retrieved 2016-07-16 – via Oxford Reference.
  42. ^ West 2001, p. 140
  43. ^ a b Mann 1996, p. 178
  44. ^ Mann 1996, p. 180
  45. ^ Mann 1996, pp. 180–81
  46. ^ Bulwer 2005, p. 13
  47. ^ a b Kallendorf 2007, p. 2
  48. ^ a b c Martindale 2007, p. 298
  49. ^ Martindale 2007, p. 301
  50. ^ Eliot 1920, p. 45
  51. ^ Shapiro 2007, p. 3
  52. ^ Shapiro 2007, p. 2
  53. ^ Kirk 1985, p. 47
  54. ^ Kirk 1985, p. 43
  55. ^ Kirk 1985, p. 45
  56. ^ Winnington-Ingram et al. 1985, p. 259
  57. ^ a b Winnington-Ingram et al. 1985, p. 258
  58. ^ Winnington-Ingram et al. 1985, pp. 339–40
  59. ^ a b c Handley 1985, p. 355
  60. ^ Handley 1985, p. 356
  61. ^ Aristotle, Metaphysics Alpha, 983b18.
  62. ^ Grant 1978, p. 11
  63. ^ Grant 1978, p. 10
  64. ^ Grant 1978, pp. 21–22
  65. ^ Grant 1978, p. 28
  66. ^ Grant 1978, p. 31
  67. ^ Grant 1978, p. 44
  68. ^ Grant 1978, p. 46
  69. ^ Grant 1978, p. 79
  70. ^ Grant 1978, pp. 83–85
  71. ^ Grant 1978, pp. 98–99
  72. ^ Grant 1978, p. 101
  73. ^ Grant 1978, p. 104
  74. ^ Grant 1978, p. 106
  75. ^ Ostler 2009, pp. xi–xii
  76. ^ Ostler 2009, p. 161
  77. ^ Ostler 2009, p. xiii
  78. ^ Ostler 2009, p. xii
  79. ^ Ziolkowski 2007, p. 26
  80. ^ Martindale 2007, p. 310

Sources[edit]

Works cited
  • Balbo, Andrea (2009). "Review of Bob Lister (ed.), Meeting the Challenge: International Perspectives on the Teaching of Latin". Bryn Mawr Classical Review.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Becker, Trudy Harrington (2001). "Broadening Access to a Classical Education: State Universities in Virginia in the Nineteenth Century". The Classical Journal. 96 (3).CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Bulwer, John (2005). Teaching Classics in Europe: An Overview (PDF). Meeting the Challenge: European Perspectives on the Teaching of Latin. Cambridge, England.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Cook, Stephen (2003-02-18). "Latin Types".CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Eliot, T. S. (1920). The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism. London, England: Methuen.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Grant, Michael (1978). The History of Rome. London, England: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Handley, E. W. (1985). "Comedy". In Easterling, P. E.; Knox, Bernard M. W. (eds.). The Cambridge History of Classical Literature. 1. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Kallendorf, Craig W. (2007). "Introduction". In Kallendorf, Craig W. (ed.). A Companion to the Classical Tradition. Malden, Massachusetts; Oxford, England; Carlton, Victoria: Blackwell.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Kaminski, Thomas (2007). "Neoclassicism". In Kallendorf, Craig W. (ed.). A Companion to the Classical Tradition. Malden, Massachusetts; Oxford, England; Carlton, Victoria: Blackwell.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Kirk, G. S. (1985). "Homer". In Easterling, P. E.; Knox, Bernard M. W. (eds.). The Cambridge History of Classical Literature. 1. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Kristeller, Paul Oskar (1978). "Humanism". Minerva. 16 (4): 586–595. doi:10.1007/BF01100334.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Mackay, Christopher (1997). "Philology".CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Mann, Wolfgang-Ranier (1996). "The Modern Historiography of Ancient Philosophy". History and Theory. 35 (2): 165–195. doi:10.2307/2505360. JSTOR 2505360.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Martindale, Charles (2007). "Reception". In Kallendorf, Craig W. (ed.). A Companion to the Classical Tradition. Malden, Massachusetts; Oxford, England; Carlton, Victoria: Blackwell.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Ostler, Nicholas (2009). Ad Infinitum: A Biography of Latin and the World it Created. London, England: HarperPress.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Renfrew, Colin (1980). "The Great Tradition versus the Great Divide: Archaeology as Anthropology". American Journal of Archaeology. 84 (3): 287–298. doi:10.2307/504703. JSTOR 504703.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Rommel, Georg (2001). "The Cradle of Titans: Classical Philology in Greifswald and its History from 1820". Illinois Classical Studies. 26.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Sandys, Sir John Edwin (1921). A History of Classical Scholarship; Volume One: From the Sixth Century B.C. to the End of the Middle Ages (3th ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. p. 591. ISBN 978-1-108-02706-9.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Shapiro, H. A. (2007). "Introduction". In Shapiro, H. A. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Archaic Greece. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Shorey, Paul (1906). "Philology and Classical Philology". The Classical Journal. 1 (6).CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Stray, Christopher (1996). "Culture and Discipline: Classics and Society in Victorian England". International Journal of the Classical Tradition. 3 (1): 77–85. doi:10.1007/BF02676905.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Stray, Christopher (2010). "'Patriots and Professors': A Century of Roman Studies". Journal of Roman Studies. doi:10.1017/s0075435810000018.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Trivedi, Harish (2007). "Western Classics, Indian Classics: Postcolonial Contestations". In Hardwick, Lorna; Gillespie, Carol (eds.). Classics in Post-Colonial Worlds. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • West, Martin (2001). "Early Greek Philosophy". In Boardman, John; Griffin, Jasper; Murray, Oswyn (eds.). The Oxford History of Greece and the Hellenistic World. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Winnington-Ingram, R. P.; Gould, John; Easterling, P. E.; Knox, Bernard M. W. (1985). "Tragedy". In Easterling, P. E.; Knox, Bernard M. W. (eds.). The Cambridge History of Classical Literature. 1. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Ziolkowski, Jan M. (2007). "Middle Ages". In Kallendorf, Craig W. (ed.). A Companion to the Classical Tradition. Malden, Massachusetts; Oxford, England; Carlton, Victoria: Blackwell.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)

Further reading[edit]

General
  • Beard, Mary; Henderson, John (2000). Classics: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780192853851.
  • Hornblower, Simon; Spawforth, Anthony, eds. (2012). Oxford Classical Dictionary (4 ed.). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199545568.
  • Abrantes, Miguel C. (2019). Sources of Classical Literature: Briefly presenting over 1000 works. ISBN 9781689096805.
Philology
  • Chadwick, John (2014). The Decipherment of Linear B (2 ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781107691766.
Greek history
  • Shipley, Graham (2000). The Greek World After Alexander 323–30 BC. London: Routledge. ISBN 9780415046183.
  • Osborne, Robin (2009). Greece in the Making 1200–479 BC (2 ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 9780415469920.
  • Hornblower, Simon (2011). The Greek World 479–323 BC (4 ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 9780415602921.
Roman history
  • Brown, Peter (1989). The World of Late Antiquity 150–750. New York: W. W. Norton. ISBN 9780393958034.
  • Crawford, M. (1993). The Roman Republic (2 ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. ISBN 9780006862505.
  • Cornell, T. J. (1995). The Beginnings of Rome. London: Routledge. ISBN 9780415015967.
  • Millar, F. (2002). Rome, the Greek World, and the East: The Roman Republic and the Augustan Revolution. 1. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 9780807849903.
Literature
  • Whitmarsh, Tim (2004). Ancient Greek Literature. Cambridge: Polity Press. ISBN 9780745627915.
Philosophy
  • Irwin, Terence (1988). Classical Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780192891778.
  • Annas, Julia (2000). Ancient Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780192853578.
  • Shields, Christopher (2012). Ancient Philosophy: A Contemporary Introduction (2 ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 9780415896603.
Art and archaeology

External links[edit]