A True Story

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from True History)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
A True Story
William Strang spider battle in 1894 True History.jpg
Illustration from 1894 by William Strang depicting a battle scene from Book One of Lucian of Samosata's A True Story
AuthorLucian of Samosata
CountrySyria, Roman Empire
LanguageGreek
GenreSatire, Science fiction

A True Story (Ancient Greek: Ἀληθῆ διηγήματα, Alēthē diēgēmata; Latin: Vera Historia or Latin: Verae Historiae) is a novel written in the second century AD by Lucian of Samosata, a Greek-speaking author of Assyrian descent. The novel is a satire of outlandish tales which had been reported in ancient sources, particularly those which presented fantastic or mythical events as if they were true. It is Lucian's best-known work.

It is the earliest known work of fiction to include travel to outer space, alien lifeforms, and interplanetary warfare. As such, A True Story has been described as "the first known text that could be called science fiction".[1][2][3][4] However the work does not fit into typical literary genres: its multilayered plot and characters have been interpreted as science fiction, fantasy, satire or parody, and have been the subject of much scholarly debate.

Plot[edit]

The novel begins with an explanation that the story is not at all "true" and that everything in it is, in fact, a complete and utter lie.[5][6] The narrative begins with Lucian and his fellow travelers journeying out past the Pillars of Heracles.[7][8] Blown off course by a storm, they come to an island with a river of wine filled with fish and bears, a marker indicating that Heracles and Dionysus have traveled to this point, and trees that look like women.[8][9] Shortly after leaving the island, they are caught up by a whirlwind and taken to the Moon,[8][10] where they find themselves embroiled in a full-scale war between the king of the Moon and the king of the Sun over colonization of the Morning Star.[8][11] Both armies include bizarre hybrid lifeforms.[12][8] The armies of the Sun win the war by clouding over the Moon and blocking out the Sun's light.[8][13] Both parties then come to a peace agreement.[14] Lucian then describes life on the Moon and how it is different from life on Earth.[8][15]

After returning to Earth, the adventurers are swallowed by a 200-mile-long (320 km) whale,[16][17] in whose belly they discover a variety of fish people, whom they wage war against and triumph over.[17][18] They kill the whale by starting a bonfire and escape by propping its mouth open.[19][17] Next, they encounter a sea of milk, an island of cheese, and the Island of the Blessed.[20][21] There, Lucian meets the heroes of the Trojan War, other mythical men and animals, as well as Homer and Pythagoras.[22][23] They find sinners being punished, the worst of them being the ones who had written books with lies and fantasies, including Herodotus and Ctesias.[24][23] After leaving the Island of the Blessed, they deliver a letter to Calypso given to them by Odysseus explaining that he wishes he had stayed with her so he could have lived eternally.[25][23] They then discover a chasm in the ocean, but eventually sail around it, discover a far-off continent and decide to explore it.[23][26] The book ends abruptly with Lucian stating that their future adventures will be described in the upcoming sequels,[27][28] a promise which a disappointed scholiast described as "the biggest lie of all".[29]

Analysis[edit]

Satire[edit]

Seventeenth-century engraving by William Faithorne depicting a fictionalized portrait of Lucian

In one view, Lucian intended his story to be a form of literary criticism, a satire against contemporary and ancient sources which quote fantastic and mythical events as truth. He mentions the tales of Ctesias, Iambulus, and Homer and states that "what did surprise me was their supposition that nobody would notice they were lying." Many characters and events are exaggerated to ridiculous ends to mock the original tellings. As noted by classicist B.P. Reardon, "above all, it is a parody of literary 'liars' like Homer and Herodotus".[30] Consequently, Lucian goes on to state that the story recounted in A True Story is about "things I have neither seen nor experienced nor heard tell of from anybody else; things, what is more, that do not in fact exist and could not ever exist at all. So my readers must not believe a word I say."[31] He justifies the title by arguing that his is the only truthful mythological story ever written, inasmuch as it is the only one that admits that it is all lies. He also promises a sequel but it is not known if such a sequel exists.

Science fiction[edit]

Contrary to some classicists, modern science fiction critics do not necessarily view the satirical streak of the story as conflicting with modern notions of science fiction. The defining element of science can rather be found in Lucian's specific, but effective approach to identify false values and misidentifications in contemporary philosophy, which was very much the general term of science then.[32] Additionally, they point out that A True Story was written in response to another work that also contained science fictional elements, that is Antonius Diogenes’ lost Of the Wonderful Things Beyond Thule, whose protagonist also reached the Moon.[32] The estranging feel of the story as a defining SF element has also been noted:

…True Stories may properly be regarded as SF because Lucian often achieves that sense of "cognitive estrangement" which Darko Suvin has defined as the generic distinction of SF, that is, the depiction of an alternate world, radically unlike our own, but relatable to it in terms of significant knowledge.[33]

According to Grewell, whose definition of science fiction focuses on the struggle between supposedly superior and inferior life forms, "part of the tale that qualifies it as science fiction, rather than as fantasy or imaginative fiction, involves Lucian and his seamen in a battle for territorial and colonization rights:[34]

"The king of the inhabitants of the Sun, Phaethon," said Endymion king of the Moon, "has been at war with us for a long time now. Once upon a time I gathered together the poorest people in my kingdom and undertook to plant a colony on the Morning Star which was empty and uninhabited. Phaethon out of jealousy thwarted the colonization, meeting us halfway at the head of his dragoons. At that time we were beaten, for we were not a match for them in strength, and we retreated. Now, however, I desire to make war again and plant the colony."[32]

In sum, typical science fiction themes and topoi appearing in True Stories are:[33]

A middle position seems to be taken up by the English critic Kingsley Amis, who acknowledged the science fiction and satirical character of True Stories at the same time:

I will merely remark that the sprightliness and sophistication of True History make it read like a joke at the expense of nearly all early-modern science fiction, that written between, say, 1910 and 1940.[35]

Modern equivalents, combining science fiction and parody in equal measure, may be found in Voltaire's Micromégas and the works of Douglas Adams.

In addition to the above, the book is an early expression of the idea of crossing the Atlantic and exploring lands that might lie on its other side – some 1400 years before Columbus.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Grewell 2001.
  2. ^ Swanson 1976, "Lucian of Samosata, the Greco-Syrian satirist of the second century, appears today as an exemplar of the science-fiction artist. There is little, if any, need to argue that his mythopoeic Milesian Tales and his literary fantastic voyages and utopistic hyperbole comport with the genre of science fiction".
  3. ^ Georgiadou & Larmour 1998: "Lucian's Verae Historiae ("True Histories"), a fantastic journey narrative considered the earliest surviving example of Science Fiction in the Western tradition."
  4. ^ Gunn 1988, p. 249: "Proto-Science Fiction"
  5. ^ Casson 1962, pp. 13–15.
  6. ^ Georgiadou & Larmour 1998, pp. 51–52.
  7. ^ Casson 1962, p. 15.
  8. ^ a b c d e f g Georgiadou & Larmour 1998, pp. 53–155.
  9. ^ Casson 1962, pp. 15–17.
  10. ^ Casson 1962, pp. 17–18.
  11. ^ Casson 1962, p. 18.
  12. ^ Casson 1962, pp. 18–21.
  13. ^ Casson 1962, p. 22.
  14. ^ Casson 1962, pp. 22–23.
  15. ^ Casson 1962, pp. 23–25.
  16. ^ Casson 1962, pp. 27–28.
  17. ^ a b c Georgiadou & Larmour 1998, pp. 156–77.
  18. ^ Casson 1962, pp. 27–33.
  19. ^ Casson 1962, p. 34.
  20. ^ Casson 1962, p. 35–37.
  21. ^ Georgiadou & Larmour 1998, pp. 156–78.
  22. ^ Casson 1962, pp. 35–45.
  23. ^ a b c d Georgiadou & Larmour 1998, pp. 178–232.
  24. ^ Casson 1962, p. 46.
  25. ^ Casson 1962, pp. 45–49.
  26. ^ Casson 1962, pp. 49–54.
  27. ^ Casson 1962, p. 54.
  28. ^ Georgiadou & Larmour 1998, pp. 232–233.
  29. ^ Casson 1962, p. 57.
  30. ^ Reardon, p. 619.
  31. ^ Reardon, p. 622.
  32. ^ a b c Swanson 1976.
  33. ^ a b Fredericks 1976.
  34. ^ Grewell, Greg (2001), "Colonizing the Universe: Science Fictions Then, Now, and in the (Imagined) Future", Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature, 55 (2): 25–47 (30f.)
  35. ^ Kingsley, Amis (1960), New Maps of Hell: A Survey of Science Fiction, New York, p. 28.

Bibliography[edit]

Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]